Calcutta High Court dismisses teachers’ petitions against new SSC recruitment rules

Mr. Jindal
5 Min Read

Calcutta High Court dismisses petitions against West Bengal SSC recruitment, leaving ‘untainted’ teachers in limbo.

Calcutta High Court dismisses petitions against West Bengal SSC recruitment, leaving ‘untainted’ teachers in limbo.

Kolkata:

The Calcutta High Court has dismissed all the petitions regarding the School Service Commission (SSC)‘s new recruitment notification where ‘untainted’ teachers who lost their jobs after the Supreme Court ruling had petitioned against many of the subject seats being reduced, and the eligibility criteria of the 2025 exams being different from 2016 making the process harder for older candidates. 

The division bench of Justice Soumen Sen and Justice Smita Das De delivered the judgement on Wednesday (July 16, 2025). They said that they will not interfere in the new notification issued by the West Bengal School Service Commission (WBSSC) new recruitment notification. A week back, Justice Saugata Bhattacharya of Calcutta High Court had only said that the government must take out the ‘tainted’ candidates out of the new examination; this judgement was upheld at the division bench ruling on Wednesday. 

Mehboob Mondal, a representative of the ‘Joggya Sikkhak Sikkhika Adhikar Mancha’ (Deserving Teachers’ Rights Forum) told The Hindu that the new rules of the 2025 recruitment is not allowing special B.Ed. candidates to fill up forms, even candidates with 40-45% marks are barred, but all of them had cracked the exams in 2016. This has left them in the lurch, even though they have served in schools as untainted teachers for over seven years. He also added that some subjects like Chemistry or Nepali language have no seats in 2025 exams, but the same teachers got jobs in 2016, now they have no option but to skip the exams and lose their jobs. 

“We had petitioned that we should not have to compete with fresh candidates because we had already passed the exam. The 2016 panel should have been separately recruited. We are losing all faith in the judiciary because they failed us and we are being punished and losing jobs because of the government’s corruption,” Habibullah, a representative of JSSAM said.  

He also shared doubts that the same WBSSC body, which was caught in a corrupt recruitment process by the Supreme Court, has been directed to conduct the rehiring process. “What is the guarantee that they will not steal our jobs again? Finding the tainted candidates cannot be our responsibility. It was either the Central Bureau of Investigation’s (CBI) responsibility or the government’s responsibility, why are we being criminalised for their lacking?” Mr Habibullah added. 

Previously, the JSSAM representatives had said that they were against filling out the new recruitment form because they are ‘untainted’ candidates, the last date for which is July 21. They wanted a review petition at the Supreme Court before the last date, but it has not yet been listed. According to the representatives, this has led to a section of the ‘untainted’ teachers filling up the new recruitment form to stay on the safe side, so they have a shot at getting back to their old jobs. 

After the verdict was announced, state lawyer and Trinamool Congress MP Kalyan Banerjee called it a victory for the state. “The court has recognized the state’s rights. The Supreme Court has said that the recruitment process has to be started according to the 2016 recruitment process. The court did not accept the unreasonable request. We also have to consider how many people have come in the last nine years,” Mr Banerjee added. 

According to the last WBSSC notification for the 2025 recruitment, the experienced teachers will get a 10 marks advantage. This is the only leeway that the 2016 panel of teachers will get in the fresh hiring process. 

The petitions were in response to the Supreme Court ruling, which upheld the cancellation of approximately 26,000 appointments made during the 2016 recruitment process conducted by the WBSSC, citing irregularities. 

On April 17, the top court allowed ‘untainted’ candidates to continue in service until December 31, or until a fresh selection process is completed. 

Share This Article
Leave a Comment