In May, the President had issued a reference under the advisory jurisdiction of the Supreme Court (Article 143 of the Constitution), questioning the court’s inherent powers under Article 142 to “impose” timelines and prescribe the manner of conduct of Governors and the President while dealing with State Bills. File
| Photo Credit: Sushil Kumar Verma
The Supreme Court on Friday (July 25, 2025) allowed the State of Kerala to withdraw two petitions filed against its State Governor’s delay in clearing crucial Bills despite stiff resistance from the Centre.
Appearing before a Bench headed by Justice P.S. Narasimha, Attorney General R. Venkataramani said the State was withdrawing on the strength of an April 8 judgment in an identical case concerning the Tamil Nadu Governor. “This is not just a simple withdrawal,” Mr. Venkataramani addressed the court.
Solicitor General Tushar Mehta asked the court to tag the Kerala petitions against its Governor with a Presidential Reference pending before a Constitution Bench.
The April 8 judgment has prescribed a maximum three-month deadline for both the President and State Governors to act on State Bills sent to them for approval or reserved for consideration under Articles 200 and 201, respectively, of the Constitution.
In May, the President had issued a reference under the advisory jurisdiction of the Supreme Court (Article 143 of the Constitution), questioning the court’s inherent powers under Article 142 to “impose” timelines and prescribe the manner of conduct of Governors and the President while dealing with State Bills.
“How can a withdrawal of a petition be tagged with a Presidential Reference before a Constitution Bench?” Senior advocate K.K. Venugopal reacted. The senior lawyer said the State was entitled to withdraw its case.
“But there is a string attached to the April 8 judgment,” Mr. Venkataramani insisted. “No strings attached… The string is cut,” Mr. Venugopal said.
In an earlier hearing on July 14, Mr. Venugopal had submitted that the April judgment had made the State’s petitions infructuous.
The law officers had countered the apex court ought to wait for the Constitution Bench’s respomses to questioms raised in the Presidential Reference.
However, Justice Narasimha had himself remarked that it would be “very, very difficult” for the apex court to stop Kerala from withdrawing its petitions.
Published – July 25, 2025 02:03 pm IST
